Medical Negligence and Personal Injury in NSW: The Case of Dominic McCabe
Legal Implications Associated with Prescribing Medicinal Cannabis
The tragic case of Dominic McCabe has raised significant concerns about the oversight of medicinal cannabis prescriptions. Dominic was 41 years of age. He had been dealing with a chronic diagnosis of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. He committed suicide. Long after his death, the small tubs of cannabis contained in small plainly packaged tubs kept arriving at the family home.
The ease with which McCabe accessed the drug, despite being under the care of a GP and psychiatrist, has led his family to call for tighter regulations within the medicinal cannabis industry. This case presents a complex web of clinical and legal questions, particularly in the context of medical negligence and the prescribing practices surrounding medicinal cannabis.
Clinical Context: Medicinal Cannabis & Mental Health
Medicinal cannabis is frequently prescribed for a range of conditions, including chronic pain, nausea, and, in some cases, mental health disorders. However, its use in patients with pre-existing mental health conditions like bipolar disorder and schizophrenia is controversial. Research has consistently shown a correlation between cannabis use and an increased risk of psychosis, particularly in individuals predisposed to mental illness. This raises the question of whether prescribing cannabis to someone with McCabe’s psychiatric history was clinically appropriate.
Several studies suggest that cannabis, particularly high-THC strains, may exacerbate symptoms of psychosis, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. The relationship between cannabis use and schizophrenia is well-documented, with heavy cannabis use being associated with an earlier onset of the disorder and a higher likelihood of worsening symptoms. Given McCabe’s medical history, the decision to prescribe cannabis without consulting his primary treating doctors becomes a critical issue.
Medical Negligence in the Context of Prescribing Medicinal Cannabis
In healthcare, negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to take reasonable care or steps to prevent loss or injury to a client. In the case of McCabe, the question of negligence would probably depend on whether the doctor who prescribed the medicinal cannabis acted in accordance with the accepted standard of care for someone with his medical background. There are several key factors to consider:
Failure to Consult with Treating Doctors: One of the most concerning aspects of this case is the publication of an assertion that the cannabis was prescribed by a doctor affiliated with the cannabis company and that there does not appear to have been any (or any sufficient) communication with McCabe’s GP or psychiatrist. In cases of complex mental health conditions, it is generally expected that any significant changes to a patient’s treatment regime should be made in consultation with their existing healthcare team. The failure to do so may constitute a breach of the duty of care.
Informed Consent: Informed consent is a cornerstone of medical ethics and law. For consent to be valid, the patient must be made fully aware of the risks and benefits of a treatment, especially when there are potential interactions with existing medications. In the McCabe case, there is no reference to whether he was adequately informed of the potential risks of cannabis use, particularly in light of his psychiatric diagnosis. It might be arguable that the prescribing doctor failed to provide adequate information or misrepresented the safety of cannabis for someone with McCabe’s condition. This could also form the basis of a negligence claim.
Appropriateness of the Prescription: Given the known risks associated with cannabis use in individuals with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the appropriateness of prescribing cannabis in this case is questionable. If it can be shown that prescribing cannabis was not a reasonable treatment option for McCabe’s condition, this could further support a claim of negligence. Courts would likely consider whether a competent doctor in the same situation would have made the same decision.
Legal Options for the Family
In cases of medical negligence, families of the deceased may pursue legal action to seek justice for their loved one. McCabe’s family, in this case, might have several avenues available to them (these may also be dependent upon the particular jurisdiction):
Compensation to Relatives Action: In New South Wales, a Compensation to Relatives action (also known as a "dependency claim") arises when a person dies due to medical negligence, and their relatives seek compensation for the financial and emotional support they would have received from the deceased had they lived. This claim is brought under the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 and typically covers dependents such as a spouse, children, or other family members who relied on the deceased for financial or emotional support. Compensation can include loss of financial contributions, the value of domestic services provided by the deceased, and funeral expenses.
To succeed in a Compensation to Relatives action, the claimants must establish that the medical negligence caused or materially contributed to the death. This involves demonstrating that the healthcare provider breached their duty of care and that this breach led to the death.
Negligence Claim Against the Prescribing Doctor: The family may bring a direct negligence claim against the doctor who prescribed the cannabis. To succeed, they would need to prove that the doctor owed McCabe a duty of care, that the duty was breached by prescribing cannabis without consulting his treating doctors, and that this breach directly resulted in harm. Evidence, including expert testimony, would be critical in establishing the accepted standard of care in such cases and whether the doctor’s conduct fell below that standard.
Claim Against the Medicinal Cannabis Company: Depending on the specifics of the company’s involvement in the prescribing process, there may also be grounds for a claim against the medicinal cannabis company. If the company was found to have encouraged inappropriate prescribing practices or exerted undue influence on the doctor, they could potentially be held liable for their role in McCabe’s death.
Potential Breach of Statutory Obligations: In Australia, healthcare practitioners are bound by both common law and statutory obligations. Under state and territory health legislation, doctors must ensure that their treatment decisions align with the patient's best interests. If the prescribing doctor’s actions contravened any such statutory duties, this could form part of the family’s case.
Remedies Available to the Family
If the family is successful in their claim, several remedies may be available to them:
Compensation to Relatives Action: The damages awarded are assessed based on the financial loss to the dependents. This loss is calculated by considering the deceased's earnings and potential future earning capacity, as well as the economic value of any non-monetary support, such as caregiving or household services. Importantly, compensation is limited to the actual losses suffered by the dependents and does not include damages for grief or emotional distress.
Compensation for Pain and Suffering: In New South Wales, family members who suffer mental harm as a result of the death of a loved one due to medical negligence may be entitled to damages under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW). To claim damages for mental harm, the claimant must establish that they have suffered a "recognisable psychiatric illness" caused by witnessing or learning of the death. This type of claim, known as a "nervous shock" claim, allows close family members—such as spouses, children, parents, or de facto partners—to seek compensation for their psychiatric injuries. The mental harm must be reasonably foreseeable, and the claimant must show that their relationship with the deceased and the circumstances surrounding the death justify compensation.
Damages for mental harm may cover both economic and non-economic losses. Economic losses can include medical expenses related to psychiatric treatment, ongoing care costs, and loss of earning capacity due to the psychiatric condition.
Non-economic damages typically account for pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and emotional distress caused by the mental harm. However, general grief and distress that do not amount to a psychiatric illness are not compensable. Additionally, strict legal thresholds apply, such as proving that the harm was caused by witnessing the aftermath or the circumstances surrounding the death in a sudden, shocking, or traumatic way.
Funeral and Medical Expenses: The family may seek reimbursement for funeral expenses (Compensation to Relatives Action) and any medical costs associated with McCabe’s treatment and death.
Wider Implications for the Medicinal Cannabis Industry
The case of Dominic McCabe highlights the need for stricter regulations governing the prescription of medicinal cannabis, particularly for individuals with complex mental health conditions. It raises questions about the accountability of doctors who prescribe the drug without proper oversight and the role of companies that may incentivise doctors to prescribe their products.
For families who have lost loved ones due to negligent medical care, cases like this serve as a reminder of the importance of vigilance in the healthcare system. It is essential that healthcare providers act in the best interests of their patients and that families are empowered to seek justice when this does not happen.
In Summary
The tragic death of Dominic McCabe underscores the risks associated with prescribing medicinal cannabis to vulnerable individuals without proper consultation with their existing medical providers. His family’s calls for tighter regulations are well-founded and highlight the broader issues of medical negligence in the rapidly growing medicinal cannabis industry. Families in similar situations have legal avenues to pursue, and doctors must be held accountable for decisions that may place their patients at risk.
If you or your loved ones have been affected by medical negligence, it’s important to understand that you can seek justice through legal avenues. Doctors and healthcare providers must be held accountable for actions that compromise patient safety.
At Veritas Law Firm, we are dedicated to helping families navigate complex medical negligence claims. If you’re concerned about medical negligence or want to explore your legal options, book an appointment with one of our experienced lawyers today or call us at 131 LAW. We are here to provide guidance, support, and help you seek the justice you deserve.
Additional Resources:
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) – Medicinal Cannabis Guidance
Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence (ACRE)
Sydney Morning Herald – Medicinal Cannabis is Booming: Here's What is and Isn't Allowed
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Veritas Law Firm makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to the content. Readers are advised to seek professional legal advice tailored to their specific circumstances before taking any action based on this information. Veritas Law Firm accepts no liability for any loss or damage incurred as a result of reliance on the information presented herein.